Cornell Sexual Assault Investigation Reopened by Prosecutors

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb8NxdXF5xI

Prosecutors in New York have reopened an investigation into an alleged sexual assault involving a former Cornell University student after she filed a civil lawsuit detailing allegations that were not previously presented to authorities in the same way.

The woman, identified as Jane Doe in court documents, alleges that she was drugged and sexually assaulted by multiple members of the Chi Phi fraternity at a fraternity house in October 2024. She was 20 years old at the time.

Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten said his office will now revisit the case and plans to present the evidence to a grand jury.

The Allegations in the Lawsuit

According to the civil complaint, Jane Doe went to the Chi Phi house while already intoxicated. She alleges that fraternity members pressured her to consume additional drugs and alcohol before multiple men sexually assaulted her over several hours.

The lawsuit alleges that a message was posted in a fraternity Snapchat group during the night suggesting that a woman upstairs was available for sex. Her attorney says the group-chat material is among the evidence that should have been investigated more thoroughly.

The allegations have not been proven in court, and the seven fraternity members named in the lawsuit have denied the accusations through their attorneys.

Why Was the Case Originally Closed?

The alleged assault was reported to Cornell police in 2024, but no criminal charges were filed at the time.

Van Houten has said that the woman's sworn statement to authorities in November 2024 did not allege that she had been drugged against her will or sexually assaulted without consent. Based on the information available to prosecutors at the time, his office determined there was not a criminal basis to bring charges.

The woman's attorney disputes that characterization and argues that investigators failed to adequately follow up on evidence surrounding the incident.

What Changed?

The civil lawsuit, filed earlier this month, brought new allegations and evidence into public view.

Among the evidence described in the lawsuit are screenshots of a fraternity group chat. Prosecutors say they were not previously aware of some of that material.

Van Houten has acknowledged that cases can need to be reconsidered when new evidence or allegations emerge. His office has now begun the process of speaking with Jane Doe and her attorneys before determining what criminal charges, if any, may be appropriate.

The Case Will Go Before a Grand Jury

Once prosecutors determine what charges may be appropriate, the evidence will be presented to a Tompkins County grand jury.

The grand jury will be able to hear testimony from Jane Doe and consider evidence raised by the civil complaint. If jurors vote to indict any of the individuals involved, the criminal case would then move forward.

The reopening does not mean that anyone has been found guilty of a crime. The allegations remain allegations unless and until they are established in court.

Cornell's Response

Cornell University has said it supports the district attorney's decision to revisit the case.

The university previously conducted its own Title IX investigation, which is separate from the criminal investigation. Cornell says that process resulted in disciplinary measures including expulsions and suspensions. The Chi Phi chapter involved in the case was also closed and remains barred from campus.

Cornell has disputed the lawsuit's characterization that the students were simply allowed to write essays as their punishment, saying the disciplinary process resulted in a range of sanctions.

A Case Under Renewed Scrutiny

The reopening has brought renewed attention to how colleges, campus police and prosecutors respond when allegations of sexual violence are reported.

For Jane Doe, the next step will be telling her story again as prosecutors reconsider the evidence surrounding an incident that occurred nearly two years ago.

The grand jury process could ultimately determine whether criminal charges are brought against any of the former students.

For now, the investigation remains active, and prosecutors say they intend to review the allegations and evidence before making a decision on prosecution.

Source: TODAY